Environmental Training
(This article appeared in the June 2003 issue of Australia's
Blitz Martial Arts magazine)
An implication of the Principle of Specificity is the need for
environmental training - self defence training out of the training
hall and in the 'street'.
In the previous article I described this sports science principle
and its place as a key component of the Tactical Approach to street
self defence training. If you are unfamiliar with the principle
you may wish to consult any sports science text or search the Internet.
One good location is "Sports Science Abstracts" at the
address given in the references. [1]
To re-iterate, the principle states that the training effect (change
in performance level) on an individual as a result of performing
any particular exercise or drill is very specific to the action
practiced. In other words for training to be truly effective, practice
sessions should mimic as closely as possible the demands of the
target environment (in our case confrontation situations), not only
in terms of the movement execution requirements but also in terms
of the perceptual and decision-making aspects of the performance.
[2]
Some of the broad implications were touched on in the previous
article. Here I will touch on another, that of the training environment.
The nature of the environment impacts our ability to perceive our
opponents and their actions, our ability to execute movements and
quite clearly impacts the tactical decisions we have to make in
the heat of a confrontation.
Location and Timing of Crime
U.S. crime statistics show that the crimes of robbery and assault
are roughly evenly split between occurring during the day versus
the night (robberies 47% during the day and 53% at night, assaults
56% during the day and 47% at night). As for location the most common
places for robberies are the street (35% of all robberies against
the person) and the home (21%) with parking lot (8.7%) being third.
Assaults most often occurred on the street (15.8%) followed by school
(15.2%) followed by home (14.2%). [3]

Australian statistics are similar. For example the Jochelson study
[3] indicated that 48.1% of assaults and 75.3% of robberies in the
Sydney district took place outdoors. The timing of offences is spread
across times and days of the week but favour the early hours of
Saturday and Sunday morning. The Briscoe and Donnelly study [4]
also confirms this. The variety of locations and times also implies
that the clothing worn at the time by participants will vary greatly.
This distribution of time and place would suggest a number of differences
in the environment between the practice conditions in the martial
arts training hall and crime locations. Specifically poor or uneven
lighting, uneven ground surfaces, obstacles and restricted area
for movement. Additionally a significant portion of the crime occurs
outdoors and is therefore subject to the elements (rain, wind, dust
etc). Regardless of time and location, the victims would be wearing
normal clothing that may assumed to be in many instances more restrictive
than martial arts uniforms. The point is that in many instances
these environmental circumstances are markedly different to that
in the training hall.
It is therefore interesting to speculate on the wisdom of conducting
so much self defence training in environments that have open space,
flat (sometimes padded) floors with bright and even lighting all
while wearing loose fitting uniforms and different footwear. It
may suit the comfort and convenience of students and instructors
but does it adequately prepare them to adjust to the environmental
impact of a confrontation in a totally different setting? The Principle
of Specificity implies not.
Impact of Different Environment
A lack of lighting or an uneven distribution of lighting will quite
clearly affect our ability to see our opponent(s) as may other environmental
factors such as rain, wind, dust or smoke. And we are dependent
on clear vision to perceive the visual clues in order to determine
how to physically respond. If this occurs at the one time where
we are in real danger, having always only trained in conditions
of good visibility, we are at a severe disadvantage.
There is a similar significant difference in ground or floor surface
between the training hall and the home, or parking lots or school
yards or the street. Having spent many hours training on that same
flat surface in our training location, we would be accustomed to
performing our technique only on that particular surface. The grip
or slippage it provides, its evenness and openness would all be
second nature to us. To then have to adjust our technique while
wearing different footwear to a surface that provides a different
grip, that is now uneven or sloping and do this on the fly in the
stress of combat is a big ask.
Training halls are generally clutter free environments. The home,
car parks, schools, street locations, public transport etc are not.
The items of furniture, walls, cars, kerbs, fences, seats, plants,
other people etc that also inhabit this space will hinder our freedom
of movement, constrain our technique. An action which in the training
hall that is performed reflexively will now have to be modified
(or stopped) consciously if an obstacle is in the way.
On the tactical level, the lighting, the ground surface and particularly
the objects in the environment all provide opportunities for seeking
tactical advantage over our opponent(s). We may position ourselves
to take advantage of differential lighting, or move onto a surface
or location of our choosing, use obstacles to hinder the opponent(s)
movements or shield ours and use items as weapons to hand. You don't
get the opportunity to practice that by confining your training
to the open well-lit training hall.
It would therefore seem obvious that some training must be conducted
in different locations or in different environmental circumstances
to allow the student to adapt to those changed circumstances. Come
the time of a confrontation, which let's face it in all probability
will be at a different location to that of training, students are
better prepared to adapt to the new environmental circumstances.
Page
1 | 2
Next
Page >>
|